Johnny Depp has utilized to the Court of Appeal to overturn a High Court ruling that he assaulted his ex-wife Amber Heard.
Last month a High Court decide rejected Depp’s declare that The Sun had dedicated libel when a 2018 article known as him a “wife-beater” for his alleged abuse in opposition to Heard, which he strenuously denied.
Mr Justice Nicol dismissed the Pirates Of The Caribbean actor’s declare, discovering The Sun had proved what was within the article was “substantially true”.
The identical decide then denied Depp permission to attraction in opposition to the findings, and ordered him to pay £628,000 in authorized prices to The Sun.
(Image: Samir Hussein/Getty Images)
(Image: Getty Images)
Mr Justice Nicol gave Depp till December 7 to apply straight to the Court of Appeal to overturn his judgment.
Depp has now filed an utility with the Court of Appeal, in accordance to a publicly-available checklist of pending appeals.
It isn’t identified what Mr Depp’s grounds of attraction are, or when a choice on his utility for permission to attraction is probably going to be made.
(Image: Getty Images)
In his judgment, printed in November, Mr Justice Nicol concluded that 12 of the 14 alleged incidents of home violence relied on by NGN did happen.
The decide discovered that Depp assaulted Heard on a dozen events and put her in “fear for her life” on three events, together with one the actress described as a “three-day hostage situation” in Australia in March 2015.
Mr Justice Nicol discovered Heard was additionally in worry for her life throughout incidents on the Eastern and Oriental Express in South East Asia in August 2015 and once more in LA in December of the identical 12 months.
(Image: Getty Images)
The decide mentioned “a recurring theme in Depp’s evidence was that Ms Heard had constructed a hoax and that she had done this as an ‘insurance policy”‘, and that Ms Heard was a “gold-digger”.
But he added: “I do not accept this characterisation of Ms Heard.”
In that assertion, Depp mentioned: “The surreal judgment of the court in the UK will not change my fight to tell the truth and I confirm that I plan to appeal.”
His solicitor Jenny Afia, from the Schillings legislation agency, had mentioned the High Court ruling was “as perverse as it is bewildering”, including: “The judgment is so flawed that it would be ridiculous for Mr Depp not to appeal this decision.”
(Image: Getty Images)
But Ms Heard’s US lawyer, Elaine Charlson Bredehoft, mentioned: “For those of us present for the London High Court trial, this decision and judgment are not a surprise.
“Very quickly, we will probably be presenting much more voluminous proof within the US.”
Depp is presently embroiled in a separate libel battle within the US, having sued Heard personally over a 2018 Washington Post opinion piece through which she claimed to be a sufferer of home abuse.
from Newsmoved https://ift.tt/33VEi81 https://ift.tt/3qzvoH4